1. The Turbo Forums - The discussion board for both hard core and beginner turbocharged vehicle enthusiasts. Covering everything from stock turbocharger cars, seriously fast drag racers, boats, motorcycles, and daily driver modified turbo cars and trucks.
    To start posting in our forums, and comment on articles and blogs please

    IF YOU ARE AN EXISTING MEMBER: You can retrieve your a password for your account here: click here.

1993 turbo mustang

Discussion in 'The Turbo "Builds" Board' started by nealysa, Nov 8, 2008.

  1. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    I am still not sure exactly what caused this failure. But it wasn't piston to valve contact. The only contact was the #8 piston and valve after the lock and retainer were destroyed and the valve dropped. Maybe lifter failure because of the spring pressures I am running? :scratch:
    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad
     
  2. silvercoupe

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    How much spring pressure are you running?
     
  3. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    I think it's 185# on the seat and 425# open.
     
  4. domn8rx

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    That's freakin crazy !!!!! I would think if it's spring pressure it would've just made the hyd lifters, solid....for a little bit. Not destroy the push rods. I worked on a car that sat for like 12 years and the valves all stuck in the guides and bent all the push rods just like that. If the valves move and no valve to piston damage....were the push rods stock?

    That's just crazy

    john
     
  5. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    I wish. The pushrods were new and measured for this application. I am not sure what went wrong. I don't think the valves were too short which would have made the pushrods too short. Maybe the lifters weren't the best and collapsed and the body got stuck in the bore. Maybe I had bad luck. I am not really sure at this point. I would love to know for sure, but I will get new springs, locks, retainers, etc., and rebuild and double and triple check everything. I guess I hoped something would be glaring to someone else and point it out to me. Live and learn.
     
  6. domn8rx

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Could the rockers be hitting the valve retainers ??
     
  7. Turbo_Baer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    are the poly locks tightened down in the pics ? i have never seen them be outside of the nut. seems to me like said before

    either that or you AND your "engine builder" thought that the rockers were pedestal mount and cranked them down. to me, wayyy over in ct, they look like stud mount. go to no lash and tighten ~1/2 turn, tighten poly lock and snug up.
     
  8. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    The geometry was obviously off. I am just not sure which caused the initial problems. It had +.050" locks and the bottom of every roller rocker appears to be very tight to the retainer. This is normally caused by the tip of the valve is being taken away from not using the right length valve. Some rockers definitely made contact with the retainer. I "think" the valves were too short which, having +.050 locks, mad the run out incorrect on the valve stem, which made the pushrod too short. I also think some lifters collapsed at about the same time. That is why the locks stick out so far. At least this is my guess. 93wannabe, you are correct. Normally I like an 1/8th of a turn to a 1/4 turn for correct pushrod length.
     
  9. silvercoupe

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Not sure about this but my hyd setup that was in my 347 that I had only had 320# on the open side. Sounds to me either the geo.. is off or too much open pressure. Just my .2$ worth... I also had to change my rockers and go with a comp pro magnum one to clear the retainers...
     
  10. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    either that or you AND your "engine builder" thought that the rockers were pedestal mount and cranked them down. to me, wayyy over in ct, they look like stud mount. go to no lash and tighten ~1/2 turn, tighten poly lock and snug up.

    You are so insightful. lol
     
  11. Briansshop

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Springs coil bound? How about retainer to guide clearance?
     
  12. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    I know I had just over .1" for coil bind, so plenty. Retainer to guide I am unsure of.
     
  13. Turbo_Baer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    i try :stupid: did you damage anything else inside from all the shavings ?
     
  14. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    This where I was really lucky. The broken lifter stayed in the valley and the broken retainer stayed in the head. I even still have great oil pressure. Of course everything will be cleaned and reassembled just to be sure.
     
  15. TwoFastT3s

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    I would check your valve spring installed height for sure, looks like coil bind to me. Cool pics though! :2thumbs:

    Nate
     
  16. huffer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    g/l with the next set :cheers:
     
  17. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Installed heights are in the 1.870 - 1.875 range

    Spring pressure at the recommended 1.850 installed height is 150-155

    Spring pressure at the current installed height is 145

    Coil bind occurs at 1.115

    With your lift (.659) and the current installed height (1.1875) the minimum spring height (open) is 1.875 - .659 = 1.216. This gives you .101 clearance for coil bind.... basically a mile
     
  18. TwoFastT3s

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Did you measure the spring coil bind? I had some springs from my trickflow heads say the coil bind was 1.10, and I compressed them on a bench and the were binding at 1.16-1.18. Never seen that much damage from valvetrain before. I ended up putting some Manley springs in to fit my cam.

    Nate
     
  19. TwoFastT3s

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Also, you need to check between the bottom of the retainer, and the valve guide/seals. Sometimes your springs have clearance, but the retainer can bottom out on the guide. Hope this helps. :cheers:
     
  20. nealysa

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    It looks like I used Ford motorsport lifters and those failed. The spring inside deteriorated quickly and almost became solid. I found this is a known problem when running higher spring pressures. My fault for not being thorough about my research. Live and learn.
     
Loading...
Similar Topics - 1993 turbo mustang Forum Date
1993 mustang 7 sec build turbo 460/c6 The Turbo "Builds" Board Jun 11, 2019
1993 Mustang LX Hatch (sinlge 80mm t4 turbo) with a 3.8 Ford V6 The Turbo "Builds" Board Jan 29, 2013
Project 13 second 1993 Mustang LX 351w High Port BG Turbo Team Z The Turbo "Builds" Board Aug 24, 2010
Loading...