1. The Turbo Forums - The discussion board for both hard core and beginner turbocharged vehicle enthusiasts. Covering everything from stock turbocharger cars, seriously fast drag racers, boats, motorcycles, and daily driver modified turbo cars and trucks.
    To start posting in our forums, and comment on articles and blogs please

    IF YOU ARE AN EXISTING MEMBER: You can retrieve your a password for your account here: click here.

Waste gate placement

Discussion in 'Turbo Tech Questions' started by Ike84, Mar 13, 2021.

  1. Ike84

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2021
    First time builder here, familiar with concepts but need help with implementation.

    I'm planning a twin turbo build for a Porsche boxster. 2.7l h6, 207hp stock, 11.4:1 compression

    So far I have gutted the intake and exhaust and now have catless 2.5" independent twin exhaust and a 3.5" short ram T intake.

    Because of the layout I want to do a remote twin setup pushing a max pressure ratio of 1.5 moving about 15lbs/min with a goal of 300hp. Obviously smaller turbos are a must to minimize lag, so I am looking at t3/4 50 trim .48 ar. (I was thinking garrett 2860s w .57 ar but want to start cheap just to prove the setup works first)

    Here's my problem - I can't find any of the t3/4 .48 turbos with an internal waste gate. I have little experience with external waste gates, but they seem like a headache in terms of plumbing - the simplest which I could see would be a single wastegate on an H pipe but I'm not sure that will work out due to flow dynamics in that setup.

    So here's my question. Since I would be running on the ridiculously low end of the turbine chart, is it possible for me to run without a wastegate on the hot side? I know the question sounds crazy. My thinking here is that since I am so low on the compressor curve I won't stress the turbo (even at WOT), I can control boost pressure on the intake side (I was thinking an external wastegate mounted on the pre-MAF intake and controlled with an electronic controller), and the setup would be virtually lag free. I know this will be less efficient since I'm wasting charged air, but it seems like a small trade off for fast spool times and saving an assload of fabrication.

    Anyway, feel free to rip this idea apart. I just wanted to get opinions from experienced builders.

    Best, Ike
     
  2. B E N

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2016
    Wastegate in the H pipe won't have flow priority, and unless your exhaust pressure is really high is not likely to do anything.

    No gate is a bad idea, remember as the turbo spools mass flow increases. You will end up with uncontrollable boost levels.

    Search for a single turbo of the right size with an internal gate. It may end up being easier to package, especially if you cant find turbos small enough for twins with internal gates.
     
    Mnlx likes this.
  3. Mnlx

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    A 50 trim is a very bad turbo choice for twins. You may even want something smaller than a 2860 for 30 lb/min at 1.5. Like Ben said, a single will be a lot more cost effective, or look for import versions of a 2554 or 2860
     
  4. Ike84

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2021
    Thanks guys. Im having a hell of a time finding import 2860s, every one I find is actually a 2871.

    In terms of controlling boost pressure without a watergate in the usual position, I could position one on the T plenum just before my MAF. That way it could effectively regulate boost (through use of an electronic controller) and also serve as my BOV. I've never seen anyone do this before, but I didn't know if there's a hard reason why this won't work.

    Why is a 50 trim bad for twin setups?

    The problem with merging the exhausts for a single turbo is all space related - essentially the rear of the transaxle is in the way of a symmetric merge, and I would have to route the exhaust to one side or the other to merge the two and then back out toward the center to get the tips back to oem position.

    Question - with remote setups, does symmetry of the exhausting piping before the turbos matter? It seems to me that unless the two sides were identical to the merge point, it would change flow characteristics and inherently hurt or help one side. Maybe that's over thinking it.
     
  5. Mnlx

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    You can't control boost on the intake side, the turbo would overspeed, and eventually destroy itself. 50 trims are bad because they're just too large on the compressor side. They would most likely surge. It's much more important to size turbos correctly on a remote mount. As long as both sides are relatively equal in volume, and number of bends I wouldn't worry about it.
     
    B E N likes this.
  6. Ike84

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2021
    Thanks mlnx, I appreciate your input. I will keep up the search.
     
  7. Disney Lincoln

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2003
    It's very common for the two banks to have unequal lengths feeding a single turbo. Many will have the turbo directly on one bank and the other side piping over to feed it.
     
  8. Ike84

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2021
    Hey thanks disney, that's really valuable to know.
     
  9. sam51

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2018
    This is how my remote single turbo set up is, it works pretty well, and I made a Y pipe just before the turbo to mount the waste gate on to give it priority when its open. I'm using a single 44 mm tial gate.
     
Loading...
Similar Topics - Waste gate placement Forum Date
waste gate placement??? Turbo Tech Questions Dec 5, 2005
External Waste Gate Control question. Turbo Tech Questions Jan 9, 2024
Waste Gate, using pressure on top Turbo Tech Questions Sep 30, 2021
Loading...
bridal-shoal