1. The Turbo Forums - The discussion board for both hard core and beginner turbocharged vehicle enthusiasts. Covering everything from stock turbocharger cars, seriously fast drag racers, boats, motorcycles, and daily driver modified turbo cars and trucks.
    To start posting in our forums, and comment on articles and blogs please

    IF YOU ARE AN EXISTING MEMBER: You can retrieve your a password for your account here: click here.

Tested my car with air filters removed

Discussion in 'Turbo Tech Questions' started by Enginerd, Oct 2, 2009.

  1. Enginerd

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    It appears that my air filters may be a bit of a resistriction at the 25 psi level. With no other changes than removing my filters, I got the following results:

    With filters:

    60' = 1.78 (spun, pedaled it)
    1/8th = 6.28/123.3 mph
    1/4th = 9.46/154.2 mph
    Boost = 24.5 psi
    A/F average about 10.2

    Without filters:
    60' = 1.73 (spun, pedaled it)
    1/8th = 6.01/127.4 mph
    1/4th = 9.08/158.7 mph
    Boost = 26 psi
    A/F average about 10.7

    Interesting that removing filters increased boost and leaned out the air fuel. Anyone else had similar results?

    Rob
     
  2. BlownShovel

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2003
    I've seen that when the filter was a restriction. The added boost = + power and required more fuel flow.
     
  3. PEARL MUSSIN

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    I noticed a big difference just on the street. I dont run filters anymore, Just screens. That is a HUGE difference!!!


    Jeremy
     
  4. brianj5600

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    What filters are y'all running?
     
  5. 85fox

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Wow thats a huge gain! I wonder if it had alot to do with the amount of boost that you are running? I doubt that someone would have similiar gains only running like 10lbs. What type of filter are you running?

    -Pete
     
  6. Enginerd

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    I run a couple big K&N conicals.
     
  7. twofast

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    my friend ran a screen on his car. removing it (no other changes) went from 153 to 158.
    on the dyno, another friend removed his small filter and picked up 40rwhp.
     
  8. Drlee50

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    front mount turbo FTW! :)
    i bought the biggest k/n filters i could find and fit back when i had twins and i agree, they were a restriction at 25 psi too. used em on the street and off at the track.
     
  9. Hemann

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    That MPH is great. You sure are picking up some speed after the spinning.
     
  10. Enginerd

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Where you been? What's up with that monster?
     
  11. Enginerd

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    My 9.08/158 run is at 5:00 mark in this vid:
    [​IMG]#ad
     
  12. 10secgoal

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Rob, mind putting a vacuum gauge in front of your turbo to see how much vacuum it draws for kind of power loss ?
     
  13. TexasTwins

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    I've been watching/waiting for something like these without the extra stuff to pop up on ebay to use as a track only ram air set up under the bumper. they also have larger CF pieces for coolers that you maybe able to find a square filter to fit.
    [​IMG]#ad
     
  14. blown385

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Interesting . That is huge ! Did you always run filters at the track before ?

    I've always wondered about my filter . Its far from your traditional conical filter , but I think it flows well . I'm going to do this test when i get a chance .

    I've never used it at the track . :noidea: It would be nice to have a smoother transition like I marked in the second pic .

    DSCN5311.jpg #ad


    fiter.JPG #ad
     
  15. GangBang Malloy

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    i also wondered what would be the best flowing air filter for turbos for street use would be. i hear those greddy ball type filters that supras run flow pretty well.
    like these


     
  16. TexasTwins

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Amsoil has a washable filter that doesn't use oil and claims a year or serivce that I will look into when I redeploy.
     
  17. Stav

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Those Jap filters are complete turd, look at the area of it, they not big at all. They CAN flow big power, but they are restrictive as hell.

    You know why all Jap cars run solid metal boost pipes from filter to turbo and usually run none at all when dragging? Because the vacumn from the restrictive filter will suck a silicone/rubber pipe shut.

    We did a practical test once, the biggest Jap filter we could get, a Blitz one you see on these 1000bhp supras etc. On a 700bhp car with a silicone inlet pipe it sucked it shut on full boost. With one of the larger K+Ns (not even the largest cone, but way larger than any of these crappy jap ones) it was fine and didnt suck the hose shut.

    A rubber hose is the simplest way of showing if your inlet is restrictive- if it shuts, its too small.

    There are K+N cones capable of flowing 700bhp+ with no restiction, maybe more, but I do notice, mostly due to lack of room maybe, a lot of cars run far far too small filters.

    Im running nothing but a screen on a 6in alloy trumpet at mo due to lack of room.

    Be warned about having long itake pipes too, even if they are the same diameter or even a little larger than the turbo inlet, they seem to lose power. Id always try and neck out the turbo inlet to 4 or even 6in right from the compressor inlet as it seems to restrict it- its like the turbine outlet but backwards- a turbo might have a 3in outlet, but if you ran a 3in downpipe its restrictive as HELL.
     
  18. GTTURBO88

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Even the screens can be a restiction. One day I tested with and without the screens and picked up 4mph with no other changes. My car is a 10.0 car on BFG DR's and the boost was 17psi with a T4 76mm with 3 inch DP.
     
  19. domn8rx

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Back when we had the 70mm on our 363ci, we went to the dyno to see why it made less power than the stock 302 and a 62mm :doh: What i did at the dyno was dump the wastegate in to the air...didn't change waything so, i by-passed the intercooler...gained 1psi... kinda of a suprise (thought it would've used more) What we found out was the turbo was to small and it made 525rwhp at 10psi (Stopped pulling at 5k) we set the boost to 15psi and made the same power (stopped pulling at 4500)

    At the end of the day, the guy asked about the air filter and if i had removed it, i said no cause it was just chicken wire over a pipe with a thin sock pulled over it. He told me that he wouldn't charge me to run it again, so i did. The car was already set back to 10psi and when we went again it made 13psi :stupid: no power change cause of the turbo but i couldn't believe it. You could see throught it

    [​IMG][​IMG]#ad
     
  20. CyanJaguar

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    dom, would you be so kind as to share how you made your red grommets? Ive never seen any for sale that size
     
Loading...
Similar Topics - Tested car air Forum Date
just tested the twin 3582s on my 4.8 tonight Turbo Tech Questions Jan 21, 2021
MOVED: Dyno Tested, questions about A/F with 42lb injectors??? Turbo Tech Questions Nov 16, 2005
Has anyone ever pressure tested their mass air meters? Turbo Tech Questions Jun 28, 2005
Loading...