1. The Turbo Forums - The discussion board for both hard core and beginner turbocharged vehicle enthusiasts. Covering everything from stock turbocharger cars, seriously fast drag racers, boats, motorcycles, and daily driver modified turbo cars and trucks.
    To start posting in our forums, and comment on articles and blogs please

    IF YOU ARE AN EXISTING MEMBER: You can retrieve your a password for your account here: click here.

FORGOTTEN KNOWLEDGE part 2

Discussion in 'Advanced Tech Section' started by Boost Engineer, Aug 1, 2009.

  1. Boost Engineer

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Some people in this forum are running "Shaft Mounted" Rockers on their very high output Boosted Engines. This article does a very good job of explaining rocker arm geometry on a shaft mounted rocker arm. Once you understand the theory a person could relate to the "state of the art" Shaft systems and what similar changes would do to their set-ups.

    http://www.eatonbalancing.com/blog/2007/12/10/rocker-arm-geometry/


    http://www.eatonbalancing.com/blog/...-ratio-by-varying-the-length-of-the-pushrods/

    Tom Vaught
     
  2. 10secgoal

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    in for later
     
  3. 99TTGT

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    thanks
     
  4. TexasTwins

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    great site
     
  5. twinturboc10

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Same thing applies to stud-mounted rockers. I ended up with a 8.15" pushrod vs. the stock 7.8" on my engine. The combination of small base circle, high lift and rocker ratio, and lash caps really changed the requirements. The difference of 1/4" in pushrod length took the rocker from scubbing all the way across the valve head to only moving about 1/16". I gained a bit more lift as well!

    Short Pushrod:
    [​IMG]#ad


    Long Pushrod:
    [​IMG]#ad
     
Loading...
Similar Topics - FORGOTTEN KNOWLEDGE Forum Date
FORGOTTEN KNOWLEDGE Advanced Tech Section Aug 1, 2009
Loading...
bridal-shoal