1. The Turbo Forums - The discussion board for both hard core and beginner turbocharged vehicle enthusiasts. Covering everything from stock turbocharger cars, seriously fast drag racers, boats, motorcycles, and daily driver modified turbo cars and trucks.
    To start posting in our forums, and comment on articles and blogs please

    IF YOU ARE AN EXISTING MEMBER: You can retrieve your a password for your account here: click here.

Intake manifold design

Discussion in 'Advanced Tech Section' started by smackary, Mar 27, 2012.

  1. Boost Engineer

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Great job on the fabricated intake.

    Tom Vaught
     
  2. Jeremy

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Here are some mostly finalized pics of the one we have been working on for a few months, its for a 4.6 3v. This is the third and final version we are going to fully build and test. We went away from transitioning the rectangular runners to round tube with velocity stacks and the excessively large plenum volume we had to this revision, keeps the rectangular runner shape the whole way with larger higher flowing runners and less volume in the plenum. Got us almost 2 more inches in runner length as well. Look forward to seeing how it does.

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad
     
  3. Boost Engineer

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Still looks like you will have a large plenum volume (much more than the typical race 4 bbl intake on a 2 valve engine).

    Nice work.

    Tom V.
     
  4. peterlocal22

    Joined:
    May 10, 2015
    New to this thread but I just read it entirety and found it very interesting.
     
  5. peterlocal22

    Joined:
    May 10, 2015
    so is the marcella intake manifold shape the way to go?
     
  6. zbrown

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    I have got it together and have been putting some miles on it. All has been great and everything working very well so far, I have been bringing the boost up slowly since I have to make a tune from scratch

    Cam and intake seen to be working very well together

    Makes around 14hg at idle.

    I had been worried about getting up on the brake with the big turbo (gt55) after changing the cam and this intake vs the stock intake with long runners as it was on the edge with the last motor. But surprisingly it pops up on the brake easier. So that is a good deal

    Also. I was worried about throttle responce and if it would be goofy or really slow with the intake layout like this. But it is quite the opposite compared to the old motor setup. It is very snappy. It doesn't take but a quick jab to put it on the limiter in neutral. Wasn't expecting this

    The fueling corresponds to this too. My tip in fuel is quite high, if this is do to the large plenum volume or what I don't know. There is no bog or sputter, I will get a vid of this

    Also seems to have shifted tq about where I want it. Only spun ot to 7500 so far but VE peaks at 7k and it is very stable from 6k all the way to 7.5k so far



    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad



    [​IMG]#ad



    [​IMG]#ad


    It is super quiet and mellow
    2015, LSX done, rx7 - YouTube

    Rx7 - YouTube
     
  7. peterlocal22

    Joined:
    May 10, 2015
    How's the distribution to each cylinder?
     
  8. Boost Engineer

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Glad your Project Intake is working so well.

    A Lot of nice work there!

    Tom V.
     
  9. zbrown

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Thanks! I am very haply so far.

    The plugs have stayed consistent so far, though hasn't been on that much power yet.

    Here is a pull on my street tires so it ramps from 4psi at 30mph to 16psi at 90mph. You hear me hit the limiter at the shift, that is 7500. Strong up there. This is 17* of timing on e40. 5th pass water at 90*

    Lsx rx7 16psi e40: http://youtu.be/FV2ly3xxrig


    Here is on the brake, this a a gt55 and a tight converter, 4200rpm and 10psi there, 15* of timing, need more timing there

    2015 transbrake rx7: http://youtu.be/kvEwP1c66Ec
     
  10. VR4drive92

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Fantastic! Looks like a run ride!
     
  11. pe_turbo

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    zbrown, where are you located? If you are close to bham alabama I'll let you use my dyno for free so you can really show everyone the gains. With 16 pages of buildup I'm sure I'm not the only one interested.
     
  12. zbrown

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Hey man thanks I wish I could take you up on that. I live in bumfuck north Dakota though haha

    OK back onto some data

    Been putting alot of miles on, runs well no issues, been turning the power up so time to finally dig into some plugs


    Here we have e50. Br7ef plugs, 15* at 5k ramping to 18* at 7500rpm, this is warming the car up, swapping the plugs in on the side of the highway and them killing it and coasting and pulling the plugs


    This is ramping the power in slow but I am touching just about 20psi and 7500rpm at shutdown (175mph)



    Anyway you can let me know what you think, I will do some cylinder trimming and report back pics

    Cylinder 7 is the warmest hole for sure


    So number 7 for sure needs some, and so does 1,..... 5 and 8 need some out

    [​IMG]#ad
     
  13. Vee_Ate_Corty

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Hopefully it's OK to post this here, my apologies if not

    I was just after alittle feed back on the new intake top 'box' Im designing/fabricating

    This is for a 289 windsor with a t70 turbo, running 15-20 psi

    First this is the current set up, its mounted to a ported truck lower, I think all of the squared of edges and the way it tapers down to the ports is pretty inaffective and I worry about how even the distribution is

    The new design ( CAD images ) will be bolted to a Edelbrock Victor EFI lower I have, I have formed the main plate and tried to remove as many corners as possible, I have also added a splitter/ diffuser to help direct the air as I worry about having distribution issues with the end ports. So I guess Im asking if the splitter is nessesary and if it will help even out the flow to all cyclinders, is the basic design sound or are there any tweeks that anyone could suggest? I was thinking that it might be better to have it angle down more at each end with more of a hump style though I wasnt sure how much that was likely to help

    So any input would be greatly appricated

    current01.png #ad


    current02.png #ad


    new01.png #ad


    new02.png #ad
     
  14. efi-diy

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Re: Intake manifold design - 4200 vortec complete

    A few pix of the design and build progress - engine is a Vortec 4200.

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad

    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad


    [​IMG]#ad



    The fuel maps needed to be retuned. No dyno results yet but the turbo spools a lot harder than it used to with the old plenum. And rolling about 20 mph going from 10% to ~75% throttle the turbo spooled hard enough the front end of the truck came up about 6" and squatted the rear suspension - it never did that before - so I believe that the mid range torque is way up. Same amount of overall boost - 8 psi.
     
  15. Boost Engineer

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Big Congratulations on a job well done and a recognizable torque improvement due to the intake.

    Tom V.
     
  16. Rip Rock

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2013
    Re: Intake manifold design - 4200 vortec complete

    Very nice efi-DIY !! This intake is truly a work of art, all the cnc work done to it, planing and building. I'm happy it worked out for you.
     
  17. efi-diy

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Thanks

    I think part of the improvement can be attributed to de-coupling the throttle body from the main plenum. The "hat" diffuses the air and may allow the air to enter the main plenum in a laminar flow..

    Kinda curious if any improvement could be had with a full rad runner inlet mounted on the plenum floor?
     
  18. SS Laser

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Any updates to any of these intakes? How about the Buick V6?
     
  19. VR4drive92

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008

    Would you think it would really be laminar flow?
     
  20. ss496

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Most non fluid dynamic savy people do not use the Reynolds number to determine/define flow (laminar ---- transition ---- turbulent)......seemly "laminar" is used to describe flow with smooth stream lines......However I think the poster is using it to describe that it buffers the larger swirls/turbulance (not from the boundary layer) from the throttle body.
     
Loading...
Similar Topics - Intake manifold design Forum Date
Intake manifold runner entry - feedback on design Advanced Tech Section Mar 15, 2015
New Billet Intake Manifold Pictures in the Intake Thread Advanced Tech Section Jan 30, 2022
Beautiful CNC intake manifold Advanced Tech Section Dec 8, 2020
Loading...